> -----Original Message----- > From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]On > Behalf Of bert hubert > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 6:13 PM > To: Vik Heyndrickx > Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: priomap table > > > Now, why are this "band column" and priomap list different? Is there a > > relationship between them, or is it just a mistake, or did I > miss something > > (also a good possibility)? > > There is an additional level of indirection in there I think. I really > really went over this with a fine comb when I wrote it. Perhaps something > changed? Would the commandline default priomap make sense? The default priomap doesn't make sense if put as-is in the last column. Anyway, the default priomap with a current kernel is still the same as in the documentation and it appears that "Minimize Delay" pings are indeed put into prio/pfifo_fast band 0, just like the table suggested. The extra layer of indirection is the fourth column of the table, which originates from I don't know where. I was experimenting with a four band prio qdisc. Now that I understand this, I think I've got to go back to the drawing board. I wondered why my "Minimize Delay" pings were classified into the second band qdisc. -- Vik _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
