Re: [LARTC] Shape and Bridge which Interface to use?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have you patched your kernel to allow access the bridge packets?
http://bridge.sourceforge.net

and also note that from what i have learned you had to use iptables,
prerouting mangle table, to mark the packets then use tc filiters to put the
packets into a qdics for shapping. and you could only shap out going traffic

you can also check out the bridges list serve @ bridge@math.leidenuniv.nl
they are a good source for bridging problems

Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "ALBRECHT, BENJAMIN" <BENJAMIN.ALBRECHT@de.thalesgroup.com>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:35 AM
Subject: [LARTC] Shape and Bridge which Interface to use?


hi list,

if tested linux bridging with the tc commands. but the kernel did not
recognized my commands. the commands are from some howto´s. the should be
correct. must i use the "bridge-interface"?

not eth0 and eth1?  anyone some progress report to this situation?

thank you


greetings benny

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

THALES COMMUNICATIONS GmbH
Benjamin Albrecht
Dept.: DP/CIT
Tel.:  +49-7231-15-3962
Fax.:  +49-7231-15-3813
eMail: Benjamin.Albrecht@de.thalesgroup.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/




_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux