You are right stef :) On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Stef Coene wrote: > On Saturday 08 June 2002 20:10, King Yung Tong wrote: > > Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I try to create final check > > for htb, and found some problem. Can you give a quick fix for the problem? > > > > 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) > > / \ > > (ceil 800kbps) 1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) > > / \ \ > > 1:4 1:12 1:14 > > / \ > > (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) > > > > The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. > > And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do > > following: > > class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. > > class 1:12 is empty all the time. > > class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 > > > > 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will > > not borrow? > > 2. Since 1:12 is always emppty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and > > 1:10 will get all the BW. > > > > But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not very ok. It will give > > BW to both 1:10 and 1:11. > HTB will try to give each class it's rate as a minimum : > ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps > prio 0 > ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps > prio 1 > > So class 1:10 gets 300kbps and class 1:11 gets 100kbps. The other 400kbps > will go to class 1:10 beacause his prio is lower. So prio is for traffic > that's left after each class gets his rate. > > I hope I'm right, Devik ? :) > > Stef > > -- > > stef.coene@docum.org > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
