ESFQ !? Did I missed something ? :-) devik On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Alexey Talikov wrote: > use latest version iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try > it work without problem (for me) > esfq is more simple in configuration that wrr > but in wrr more features for traffic control > and its use another principle > read more about WRR and also see doc in package wrr and > see http://docum.org/. > > 05.06.2002 18:09:07, "Vladimir Trebicky" <druid@mail.cz> wrote: > > >That sound like something what I exactly need. > > 1) what is the difference (adv & disadv) between esfq and wrr? > > 2) little problem in attachment, I don't know what to do. I tried latest > >(that 2002-try) and latest stable version (ss010824). > > > > > >> Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details > >> or use ESFQ > >> see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002 > >> I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything > >> patch kernel and tc > >> cd iproute2 > >> patch -p1 < ../esfq-tc.diff > >> cd linux-2.4.18 > >> patch -p1 < ../esfq-2.4.18.diff > >> recompile kernel and tc thats all !! > >> see README > >> Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment > >> Example: > >> > >> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src > >> > >> It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session > >like classic SFQ > >> For detail see SFQ > >> 05.06.2002 15:34:05, "Vladimir Trebicky" <druid@mail.cz> wrote: > >> > >> >I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from > >> >100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9 > >> >threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread taking > >10%. > >> >I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care > >how > >> >many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on > >eth1. > >> >But how? > >> >Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with > >priorizing > >> >small packets on eth0? How? > >> >I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately - > >it's > >> >only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC) > >> > > >> >Thanks > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Vladimir Trebicky > >> >druid@mail.cz > >> > > >> > > >> >--- > >> >Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. > >> >Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). > >> >Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > >> >http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > >> > > >> > >> ----------------------------------- > >> mailto:alexey_talikov@texlab.com.uz > >> BR > >> Alexey Talikov > >> FORTEK > >> ----------------------------------- > >> > > > > > >--- > >Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. > >Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). > >Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 > > > > > > ----------------------------------- > mailto:alexey_talikov@texlab.com.uz > BR > Alexey Talikov > FORTEK > ----------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
