Re: [LARTC] cbq parameters

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



only note, as of HTB 3.6 it detects non-work conserving discipline
as leaf and should work ok (only will eat more cpu).
devik

On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stef Coene wrote:

> On Thursday 30 May 2002 22:33, Leandro Stasi wrote:
> > If I create a cbq qdisc as a leaf of a cbq class, the bandwith rate is
> > the same of the root cbq qdisc or the rate of the cbq class?
> It's not recommended to add a cbq qdisc on a cbq class.  It's better to bound
> the first class and add the class to the bounded class in stead of adding a
> second qdisc.  Cbq (and htb) are not made (designed) to be attached on a leaf
> class.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux