[LARTC] CQB and prio

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [LARTC] CQB and prio
From: stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx (Stef Coene)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 14:14:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <3CD12A1B.6060102@knet.es>
References: <3CD11E7E.2030701@knet.es> <OF84F95BC4.B49EE162-ONC1256BAD.003FE8E4@axi.nl> <3CD12A1B.6060102@knet.es>

On Thursday 02 May 2002 13:59, Andoni Ayala - KNET wrote:
> Ok, with PRIO directive?
>
> I put PRIO=3D1
>
> are this correct?
Yes
Lower prio will get higher priority.

Stef

--=20

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

References:
- [LARTC] CQB and prio
  - From: Andoni Ayala - KNET
- [LARTC] CQB and prio
  - From: Stef Coene
- [LARTC] CQB and prio
  - From: Andoni Ayala - KNET

Prev by Date: [LARTC] CQB and prio
Next by Date: [LARTC] How to do Demasquerading before PREROUTING on one device for incoming packets?
Previous by thread: [LARTC] CQB and prio
Next by thread: [LARTC] How to do Demasquerading before PREROUTING on one device for incoming packets?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux