[LARTC] SFQ only on lowlevel-subclasses?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [LARTC] SFQ only on lowlevel-subclasses?
From: Nils.Lichtenfeld@xxxxxxx (Nils Lichtenfeld)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:20:47 +0200

Hi there!

If I use a structure (with HTB) like this one:

10:0
|       \
10:1  10:2
|
10:3
|       \
10:5  10:6

Sould I only use sfq on classes 10:2, 10:5 and 10:6?
If the answer is yes, is it a problem if sfq also runs on for example 10:3?


Greetings Nils

Follow-Ups:
- [LARTC] SFQ only on lowlevel-subclasses?
  - From: Martin Devera

Prev by Date: [LARTC] who uses skb->priority?
Next by Date: [LARTC] SFQ only on lowlevel-subclasses?
Previous by thread: [LARTC] who uses skb->priority?
Next by thread: [LARTC] SFQ only on lowlevel-subclasses?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux