Hello Patrick! From: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@trash.net> > > this is only internal mark to know whether the skb was > > already in IMQ. You could use it but you would have to > > add new user parameter to the interface structure. > > I didn't want to do it as I want the pach to be as simple > > as possible. > > devik > The same problem was bugging me a couple of days ago so i wrote an > iptables target which > allows you to exclude packets from beeing enqueued to the imq device. > The patch is tested with iptables-1.2.6a but should work with almost any > recent version. > After applying it you have to execute a "chmod +x > extensions/.IMQX-test", then > make patch-o-matic as usual. This sounds great and might be usefull in the future. We are still using 2.2.19 here so no iptables atm. By the way: Imagine the IMQ-device is allready up and a new ISDN-device is comming up, will the packages of the new ISDN-device automatically be send to IMQ or do I have to take the IMQ-device down and up again? Thanks! Greetings Nils
