[LARTC] Has anybody used HTB?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    Until now I've been using HTB instead of CBQ and it worked quite 
good. I try now to prio ICMP and SSHwith the following:

tc_htb qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10

 # total
 #78Kbytes 
 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 76kbps ceil 78kbps 
burst 2k

 #50Kbytes 
 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 48kbps ceil 
76kbps burst 2k
   #PRIO as qdisk for this slice
   tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 100: prio
     #I try to avoid a situation where a "massive" ping would disrupt 
everything else
     tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:1 handle 101 tbf rate 8kbps 
latency 1500ms burst 1540
     #The second band (probably HTTP) shouldn't eat everything from FTP 
which should be tc filtered in band 3...
     tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:2 handle 102:1 htb default 100221

     tc class add dev eth1 parent 102:1 classid 1002:1 htb rate 40kbps 
ceil 76kbps burst 2k   

... and the last line gives me an error:    RTNETLINK answers: Invalid 
argument. Why?



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux