I've seen examples like this, but what I'm not clear on is if the filter handle has to be the same as the fwmark or if the flowid has to be <class parent>:<fwmark>. Either way seems not right, but nothing else seems to make sense, based on the examples I've seen. On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Viktor Kemmet wrote: > # Mark Packets according to destination port number > iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -p udp --destination-port 5003 -j MARK --set-mark 3 > iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -p udp --destination-port 5002 -j MARK --set-mark 2 > iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -p udp --destination-port 5001 -j MARK --set-mark 1 > > $TC class change $EGDEV classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 \ > value 0xb8 > #becomes AF11 > $TC class change $EGDEV classid 1:2 dsmark mask 0x3 \ > value 0x28 > #becomes AF21 > $TC class change $EGDEV classid 1:3 dsmark mask 0x3 \ > value 0x48 > > $TC filter add $EGDEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 1 fw flowid 1:1 > $TC filter add $EGDEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 2 fw flowid 1:2 > $TC filter add $EGDEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 3 fw flowid 1:3
