Il 31/01/2014 13:24, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
On 31/01/14 12:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/01/2014 13:53, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
+static inline void kvm_async_page_present_async(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_async_pf *work)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF_SYNC
+ kvm_arch_async_page_present(vcpu, work);
+#endif
+}
+
This is not used, should it be used in kvm_check_async_pf_completion?
Yes. Looks like this got mixed up when updating the branch from before
commit f2e106692d5189303997ad7b96de8d8123aa5613 (KVM: Drop FOLL_GET in
GUP when doing async page fault) on top of this commit. Do you want a
respin of the series or an on top patch?
It should only break s390, so your call. I think a respin would be
preferrable for you. :)
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
