On 01/16/2014 04:04 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > I don't think so - this would only be an issue if the conditions used > | instead of ||. || implies a sequence point between evaluating the > left and right sides, and the standard says: "The presence of a > sequence point between the evaluation of expressions A and B > implies that every value computation and side effect associated > with A is sequenced before every value computation and side > effect associated with B." This only applies to single-threaded code. Multithreaded code must be data-race free for that to be true. See https://lwn.net/Articles/508991/ > And even if there was a problem (i.e. my interpretation of the > above being incorrect), I don't think you'd need ACCESS_ONCE() > here: The same local variable can't have two different values in > two different use sites when there was no intermediate > assignment to it. Same comment as above. Julian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
