Il 16/01/2014 16:12, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: >> > I'm applying patches 1-10 (for now to kvm/queue). >> > >> > For the last two, I prefer to wait for 3.15. > Should we disable the broken features in 3.14? I was thinking about it---which would have meant applying patches 1-8 only. In the end I decided not to do it because the patch doesn't affect KVM-on-KVM emulation. If the patch already helped you in developing Jailhouse, so the feature must not be _completely_ broken. So the churn of reverting the feature now and reapplying it later is not warranted, IMO. Thanks, Paolo >> > >> > Also, for patch 11 I would really prefer to use check_nested_events for >> > both VMX and SVM. I will look at SVM next week. > OK, thanks. I will send an updated patch 11 and also a patch on top of 4 > to read the physical bit width from the guest cpuid. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
