On 2013-12-30 16:09, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@xxxxxxxxx>
You should explain the "why" here, e.g. point to the SDM section that
requires this ordering.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index b2fe1c2..44d4f829 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -6460,11 +6460,11 @@ static bool nested_vmx_exit_handled_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int size;
> u8 b;
>
> - if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING))
> - return 1;
> -
> - if (!nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS))
> + if (!nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS)) {
> + if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING))
> + return 1;
Minor nit, but what about
if (!nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS))
return nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING);
instead?
Logic is correct, thanks for addressing this.
Could you also write an according sub-test in kvm-unit-tests [1]? We are
already checking IO bitmap accesses, but not yet unconditional PIO
exiting. Would be great!
Jan
[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git
> return 0;
> + }
>
> exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
