Il 16/12/2013 12:55, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> It's a pathological case, but still a valid one: If L1 disables APIC
> virtualization and also allows L2 to directly write to the APIC page, we
> have to forcibly enable APIC virtualization while in L2 if the in-kernel
> APIC is in use.
>
> This allows to run the direct interrupt test case in the vmx unit test
> without x2APIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index da04247..7c3ea63 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -7771,6 +7771,11 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> else
> vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
> page_to_phys(vmx->nested.apic_access_page));
> + } else if (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
> + exec_control |=
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
> + vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
> + page_to_phys(vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_access_page));
> }
>
> vmcs_write32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, exec_control);
>
Applied, thanks.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
