Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix guest-initiated crash with x2apic (CVE-2013-6376)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 13/12/2013 17:07, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> >    This bug can only be hit when the destination cpu is > 256, so the
> >    request itself is buggy -- we don't support that many in kvm and it
> >    would crash when initializing the vcpus if we did.
> >    => It looks like we should just ignore the ipi, because we have no
> >       vcpus in that cluster.
> 
> That's what should happen in physical mode.  Something like this patch:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 5439117d5c4c..1f8e9e1abd3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -613,9 +615,10 @@ bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
>  
>  	if (irq->dest_mode == 0) { /* physical mode */
>  		if (irq->delivery_mode == APIC_DM_LOWEST ||
> -				irq->dest_id == 0xff)
> +		    irq->dest_id == 0xff ||
> +		    (apic_x2apic_mode(src) && irq->dest_id > 0xff))
Here you fall back to slow path wich still uses irq->dest_id == 0xff as broadcast test.

>  			goto out;
> -		dst = &map->phys_map[irq->dest_id & 0xff];
> +		dst = &map->phys_map[irq->dest_id];
>  	} else {
>  		u32 mda = irq->dest_id << (32 - map->ldr_bits);
>  
> 
> On top of this, the x2apic spec documents a "broadcast" destination ID that
> could be implemented as follows.  But I have no idea if this is correct and
> how it differs from the usual broadcast shorthand:
> 
> @@ -815,9 +818,11 @@ static void apic_send_ipi(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
I'd rather add kvm_apic_is_broadcast() function like that:
bool kvm_apic_is_broadcast(struct kvm_lapic *l, u32 dest)
{
 return dest == (apic_x2apic_mode(l) ? 0xffffffff : 0xff);
}

and use everywhere instead of  irq->dest_id == 0xff test.

>  	irq.level = icr_low & APIC_INT_ASSERT;
>  	irq.trig_mode = icr_low & APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG;
>  	irq.shorthand = icr_low & APIC_SHORT_MASK;
> -	if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
> +	if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
>  		irq.dest_id = icr_high;
> -	else
> +		if (icr_high == 0xFFFFFFFF)
> +			irq.shorthand = APIC_DEST_ALLINC;
> +	} else
>  		irq.dest_id = GET_APIC_DEST_FIELD(icr_high);
>  
>  	trace_kvm_apic_ipi(icr_low, irq.dest_id);
> 
> 
> >  - Where does the 'only one supported cluster' come from?
> > 
> >    I only see we use 'struct kvm_lapic *logical_map[16][16];', which
> >    supports 16 clusters of 16 apics = first 256 vcpus, so if we map
> >    everything to logical_map[0][0:15], we would not work correctly in
> >    the cluster x2apic, with > 16 vcpus.
> 
> I think you're right.  Something like this would be a better fix:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
See my answer to Radim. There is not point in maintaining cid mapping that cannot be
addressed.

> index dec48bfaddb8..58745cbbb7e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		cid = apic_cluster_id(new, ldr);
>  		lid = apic_logical_id(new, ldr);
>  
> -		if (lid)
> +		if (cid < ARRAY_SIZE(new->logical_map) && lid)
>  			new->logical_map[cid][ffs(lid) - 1] = apic;
>  	}
>  out:
> @@ -621,9 +621,12 @@ bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
>  		dst = &map->phys_map[irq->dest_id & 0xff];
>  	} else {
>  		u32 mda = irq->dest_id << (32 - map->ldr_bits);
> +		u32 cid = apic_cluster_id(map, mda);
>  
> -		dst = map->logical_map[apic_cluster_id(map, mda)];
> +		if (cid >= ARRAY_SIZE(map->logical_map))
> +			goto out;
>  
> +		dst = map->logical_map[cid];
>  		bitmap = apic_logical_id(map, mda);
>  
>  		if (irq->delivery_mode == APIC_DM_LOWEST) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index c8b0d0d2da5c..5ccb71658894 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -152,8 +152,6 @@ static inline u16 apic_cluster_id(struct kvm_apic_map *map, u32 ldr)
>  	ldr >>= 32 - map->ldr_bits;
>  	cid = (ldr >> map->cid_shift) & map->cid_mask;
>  
> -	BUG_ON(cid >= ARRAY_SIZE(map->logical_map));
> -
>  	return cid;
>  }
>  
> playground:~/work/upstream/linux-2.6/arch/x86 pbonzini$ vi kvm/lapic.c
> playground:~/work/upstream/linux-2.6/arch/x86 pbonzini$ git diff !$
> git diff kvm/lapic.c
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index dec48bfaddb8..1005185972a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -143,8 +143,6 @@ static inline int kvm_apic_id(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  	return (kvm_apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xff;
>  }
>  
> -#define KVM_X2APIC_CID_BITS 0
> -
>  static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_apic_map *new, *old = NULL;
> @@ -182,8 +180,7 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		if (apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
>  			new->ldr_bits = 32;
>  			new->cid_shift = 16;
> -			new->cid_mask = (1 << KVM_X2APIC_CID_BITS) - 1;
> -			new->lid_mask = 0xffff;
> +			new->cid_mask = new->lid_mask = 0xffff;
>  		} else if (kvm_apic_sw_enabled(apic) &&
>  				!new->cid_mask /* flat mode */ &&
>  				kvm_apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_DFR) == APIC_DFR_CLUSTER) {
> @@ -198,7 +195,7 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		cid = apic_cluster_id(new, ldr);
>  		lid = apic_logical_id(new, ldr);
>  
> -		if (lid)
> +		if (cid < ARRAY_SIZE(new->logical_map) && lid)
>  			new->logical_map[cid][ffs(lid) - 1] = apic;
>  	}
>  out:
> @@ -621,9 +618,12 @@ bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
>  		dst = &map->phys_map[irq->dest_id & 0xff];
>  	} else {
>  		u32 mda = irq->dest_id << (32 - map->ldr_bits);
> +		u32 cid = apic_cluster_id(map, mda);
>  
> -		dst = map->logical_map[apic_cluster_id(map, mda)];
> +		if (cid >= ARRAY_SIZE(map->logical_map))
> +			goto out;
>  
> +		dst = map->logical_map[cid];
>  		bitmap = apic_logical_id(map, mda);
>  
>  		if (irq->delivery_mode == APIC_DM_LOWEST) {
> 

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux