On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 20:12 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-12-09 19:58, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:38:15 -0600 > > Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> What would combining them solve, other than making it more likely that > >> Greg complains about the wildcard because it would no longer be handled > >> at the bus level where all the other matching goes on? > >> > >> They are logically separate things. That doesn't change just because we > >> currently plan to use them together. > > > > Jan? Given the above, what would be the advantage of merging > > sysfs_bind_only and (PCI drivers' PCI_ANY_ID and platform drivers' > > match_any_dev)? > > That you cannot configure (likely) meaningless or even harmful (bind-any > + auto-bind) configurations. If you want to put in a check that warns on bind-any plus auto-bind, fine -- but that doesn't mean they should share a mechanism. It's valid to have no-auto-bind without a wildcard match. And FWIW, PCI already has wildcard matches without any no-auto-bind mechanism (it's presumably not intended to specify PCI_ANY_ID for all fields, but it is allowed AFAICT). -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html