[PATCH v2 1/2] target-i386: fix cpuid leaf 0x0d

["Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From cb3b12dd9873929b3a03214e3aa0ee5297e75119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 04:17:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] target-i386: fix cpuid leaf 0x0d

Fix cpuid leaf 0x0d which incorrectly parsed eax and ebx.

However, before this patch the CPUID worked fine -- the .offset
field contained the size _and_ was stored in the register that
is supposed to hold the size (eax), and likewise the .size field
contained the offset _and_ was stored in the register trhat is
supposed to hold the offset (ebx).

Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 target-i386/cpu.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 864c80e..544b57f 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ typedef struct ExtSaveArea {
 
 static const ExtSaveArea ext_save_areas[] = {
     [2] = { .feature = FEAT_1_ECX, .bits = CPUID_EXT_AVX,
-            .offset = 0x100, .size = 0x240 },
+            .offset = 0x240, .size = 0x100 },
 };
 
 const char *get_register_name_32(unsigned int reg)
@@ -2225,8 +2225,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
             const ExtSaveArea *esa = &ext_save_areas[count];
             if ((env->features[esa->feature] & esa->bits) == esa->bits &&
                 (kvm_mask & (1 << count)) != 0) {
-                *eax = esa->offset;
-                *ebx = esa->size;
+                *eax = esa->size;
+                *ebx = esa->offset;
             }
         }
         break;
-- 
1.7.1

Attachment: 0001-target-i386-fix-cpuid-leaf-0x0d.patch
Description: 0001-target-i386-fix-cpuid-leaf-0x0d.patch