Re: question about VM kernel parameter idle=<poll/mwait/halt/nomwait>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:01:39AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:45:28AM +0000, Zhanghaoyu (A) wrote:
> > Hi, all
> > 
> > What's the difference of the linux guest kernel parameter idle=<poll/mwait/halt/nomwait>, especially in performance?
> > 
> > Taking the performance into account, which one is best?
> > 
> > In my opinion, if the number of all VMs' vcpus is far more than that of pcpus, e.g. SPECVirt test, idle=halt is better for server's total throughput,
> > otherwise, e.g. in some CT scenario, the number of total vcpus is not greater than that of pcpus, idle=poll is better for server's total throughput,
> > because of less latency and VMEXIT.
> 
> Makes sense overall.
> 
> > linux-3.9 and above, idle=mwait is not recommended.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Zhang Haoyu
> 
> Does it actually have effect? I didn't think it would.
mwait instruction is never exposed to a guest. With idle=mwait is will
likely fall back to halt silently.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux