On 13 November 2013 07:25, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 13/11/2013 03:27, Richard Henderson ha scritto: >> I think it's also worthwhile to implement the kvm api in kvm-stub.c, >> unnecessary or not. If you really want compile-time feedback on those that >> ought to have been removed by optimization, you could elide them from the stub >> file depending on ifndef __OPTIMIZE__. > > Good idea. Peter, can you do that? I still think this serves no useful purpose and we'd be better off without such an ifndef, but I'd rather have a guarded stub than no stub, so I'll send a patch in a moment. thanks -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html