On 12 November 2013 15:58, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't really see a reason why QEMU should give clang more weight than > Windows or Mac OS X. I'm not asking for more weight (and actually my main reason for caring about clang is exactly MacOSX). I'm just asking that when a bug is reported whose underlying cause is "we don't work on clang because we're relying on undocumented behaviour of gcc" with an attached patch that fixes this by not relying on the undocumented behaviour, that we apply the patch rather than saying "why do we care about clang"... This seems to me to be a win-win situation: * we improve our code by not relying on undocumented implentation specifics * we work on a platform that, while not a primary platform, is at least supported in the codebase and has people who fix it when it breaks -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
