On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 07:56 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 16:30 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > From: Bharat Bhushan <r65777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This way we can use same data type struct with KVM and > > > also help in using other debug related function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> > > It would be nice to have PPC maintainers (CCed) ACKs here. This patch > > also has merging conflicts with cbc9565e (should be easy to resolve) > > Is it easier if I put it in powerpc -next and resolve the conflicts ? > > I was ok with the patch but yes, I should probably have put it in a > topic branch in the first place and merge it both in my tree and Alex. It's already in your -next via my tree (sha1 51ae8d4a2b9e4aa9a502061b9c39168e08829b94). I didn't realize Alex was planning on applying it. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
