> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:53 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex
> Williamson; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; a.motakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> agraf@xxxxxxx; Sethi Varun-B16395; peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx;
> santosh.shukla@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device
>
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 02:45 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:33 AM
> > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex
> > > Williamson; linux- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > a.motakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; agraf@xxxxxxx; Sethi Varun-B16395;
> > > Bhushan Bharat-R65777; peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > santosh.shukla@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a
> > > platform device
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:44 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> > > > Ah, think I understand now...yes that works as well, and would be
> > > > less intrustive. So are you writing a patch? :)
> > >
> > > I've been meaning to since the previous round of discussion, but I've been
> busy.
> > > Would someone else be able to test it in the context of using it for VFIO?
> >
> > I wish I could have but I do not have vfio-platform stuff.
>
> VFIO PCI without new_id would also be a useful test.
I will do that :)
-Bharat
>
> -Scott
>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
