On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:00:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/09/2013 11:51, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > All exceptions should be checked for intercept during delivery to L2,
> > but we check only #PF currently. Drop nested_run_pending while we are
> > at it since exception cannot be injected during vmentry anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > index 663bc5e..5bfa09d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > @@ -1902,12 +1902,11 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > * a #PF exception (this is the only case in which KVM injects a #PF when L2
> > * is running).
> > */
> > -static int nested_pf_handled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +static int nested_ex_handled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr)
> > {
> > struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> >
> > - /* TODO: also check PFEC_MATCH/MASK, not just EB.PF. */
>
> Just one more question, why drop this comment? It doesn't seem
> incorrect in the particular case where nr == PF_VECTOR.
>
I moved it to vmx_inject_page_fault_nested().
> > - if (!(vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << PF_VECTOR)))
> > + if (!(vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << nr)))
> > return 0;
> >
> > nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu);
> > @@ -1921,8 +1920,7 @@ static void vmx_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> > struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > u32 intr_info = nr | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK;
> >
> > - if (!reinject && nr == PF_VECTOR && is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> > - !vmx->nested.nested_run_pending && nested_pf_handled(vcpu))
> > + if (!reinject && is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_ex_handled(vcpu, nr))
> > return;
> >
> > if (has_error_code) {
> >
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
