Il 23/09/2013 15:36, Paul Gortmaker ha scritto: >> > The change is not completely trivial, it splits lock. There is no >> > obvious problem of course, otherwise you wouldn't send it and I >> > would ack it :), but it does not mean that the chance for problem is >> > zero, so why risk stability of stable even a little bit if the patch >> > does not fix anything in stable? >> > >> > I do not know how -rt development goes and how it affects decisions for >> > stable acceptance, why can't they carry the patch in their tree until >> > they move to 3.12? > The -rt tree regularly carries mainline backports that are of interest > to -rt but perhaps not of interest to stable, so there is no problem > doing the same with content like this, if desired. Perfect, I'll queue [v2 of] these patches for 3.12 then. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
