>>> On 9/8/2013 at 07:13 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:42:09PM -0600, Bruce Rogers wrote: >> Opcode CA >> >> This gets used by a DOS based NetWare guest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> index 2bc1e81..aee238a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> @@ -2025,6 +2025,26 @@ static int em_ret_far(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) >> return rc; >> } >> >> +static int em_ret_far_imm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) >> +{ >> + int rc; >> + unsigned long cs; >> + >> + rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &ctxt->_eip, ctxt->op_bytes); >> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) >> + return rc; >> + if (ctxt->op_bytes == 4) >> + ctxt->_eip = (u32)ctxt->_eip; >> + rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, &cs, ctxt->op_bytes); >> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) >> + return rc; >> + rc = load_segment_descriptor(ctxt, (u16)cs, VCPU_SREG_CS); >> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) >> + return rc; >> + rsp_increment(ctxt, ctxt->src.val); >> + return X86EMUL_CONTINUE; >> +} >> + > Why not: > > static int em_ret_far_imm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) > { > int rc; > rc = em_ret_far(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); > if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) > return rc; > rsp_increment(ctxt, ctxt->src.val); > return X86EMUL_CONTINUE; > } > > -- > Gleb. Yes, that does seem better. Ack. Bruce -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html