On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too >> often in this area. > > > Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken > or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no? > This is a mechanical change, no more. The classic way for things to break is that a header update accidentally reverts something (because a previous update was from kvm-next and this one is from mainline, for example). Accidental updates against a kernel which is neither kvm-next nor mainline are the other common "broken" version of a header update patch. -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
