Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-08-15 09:41, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2013-08-13 17:56, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
>>> Add test cases for ENT_LOAD_PAT, ENT_LOAD_EFER, EXI_LOAD_PAT,
>>> EXI_SAVE_PAT, EXI_LOAD_EFER, EXI_SAVE_PAT flags in enter/exit
>>> control fields.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li <yzt356@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  x86/vmx.h       |    7 +++
>>>  x86/vmx_tests.c |  185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 192 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/x86/vmx.h b/x86/vmx.h
>>> index 28595d8..18961f1 100644
>>> --- a/x86/vmx.h
>>> +++ b/x86/vmx.h
>>> @@ -152,10 +152,12 @@ enum Encoding {
>>>       GUEST_DEBUGCTL          = 0x2802ul,
>>>       GUEST_DEBUGCTL_HI       = 0x2803ul,
>>>       GUEST_EFER              = 0x2806ul,
>>> +     GUEST_PAT               = 0x2804ul,
>>>       GUEST_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL  = 0x2808ul,
>>>       GUEST_PDPTE             = 0x280aul,
>>>
>>>       /* 64-Bit Host State */
>>> +     HOST_PAT                = 0x2c00ul,
>>>       HOST_EFER               = 0x2c02ul,
>>>       HOST_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL   = 0x2c04ul,
>>>
>>> @@ -330,11 +332,15 @@ enum Ctrl_exi {
>>>       EXI_HOST_64             = 1UL << 9,
>>>       EXI_LOAD_PERF           = 1UL << 12,
>>>       EXI_INTA                = 1UL << 15,
>>> +     EXI_SAVE_PAT            = 1UL << 18,
>>> +     EXI_LOAD_PAT            = 1UL << 19,
>>> +     EXI_SAVE_EFER           = 1UL << 20,
>>>       EXI_LOAD_EFER           = 1UL << 21,
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  enum Ctrl_ent {
>>>       ENT_GUEST_64            = 1UL << 9,
>>> +     ENT_LOAD_PAT            = 1UL << 14,
>>>       ENT_LOAD_EFER           = 1UL << 15,
>>>  };
>>>
>>> @@ -354,6 +360,7 @@ enum Ctrl0 {
>>>       CPU_NMI_WINDOW          = 1ul << 22,
>>>       CPU_IO                  = 1ul << 24,
>>>       CPU_IO_BITMAP           = 1ul << 25,
>>> +     CPU_MSR_BITMAP          = 1ul << 28,
>>>       CPU_SECONDARY           = 1ul << 31,
>>>  };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c
>>> index c1b39f4..61b0cef 100644
>>> --- a/x86/vmx_tests.c
>>> +++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,15 @@
>>>  #include "vmx.h"
>>> +#include "msr.h"
>>> +#include "processor.h"
>>> +#include "vm.h"
>>> +
>>> +u64 ia32_pat;
>>> +u64 ia32_efer;
>>> +
>>> +static inline void vmcall()
>>> +{
>>> +     asm volatile("vmcall");
>>> +}
>>>
>>>  void basic_init()
>>>  {
>>> @@ -76,6 +87,176 @@ int vmenter_exit_handler()
>>>       return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +void msr_bmp_init()
>>> +{
>>> +     void *msr_bitmap;
>>> +     u32 ctrl_cpu0;
>>> +
>>> +     msr_bitmap = alloc_page();
>>> +     memset(msr_bitmap, 0x0, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> +     ctrl_cpu0 = vmcs_read(CPU_EXEC_CTRL0);
>>> +     ctrl_cpu0 |= CPU_MSR_BITMAP;
>>> +     vmcs_write(CPU_EXEC_CTRL0, ctrl_cpu0);
>>> +     vmcs_write(MSR_BITMAP, (u64)msr_bitmap);
>>> +}
>>
>> Better safe this function for the test case where you actually stress
>> the bitmap.
> What do you mean by "safe"?

I meant the other "save": This function serves no purpose here. Let's
only introduce it when that changes, i.e. when you actually test the MSR
bitmap.

Jan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux