On 8 August 2013 21:57, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm fine with having a discovery mechanism for the GIC and not for the > CPU, if there's an implicit discovery mechanism for the CPU. But are > we sure there will not be cases where we want to know the list of > available CPUs that the kernel can actually emulate on this host as > opposed to "just use the best one". I guess "telling the user in advance whether enabling kvm is going to work" (either via -help output or via monitor to tell libvirt about it) might want that, and for that matter maybe kvmtool might want to present a list of available CPUs. (I probably wouldn't implement the 'say if it's going to work in -help' bit immediately though because QEMU's internal structure makes it a little awkward. But if we might want it it's probably better for the kernel API to be there from the start.) -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
