Re: [PATCH RFC V11 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2013 04:20 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
So, having read through the entire thread I *think* this is what the
status of this patchset is:

1. Patches 1-17 are noncontroversial, Raghavendra is going to send an
    update split into two patchsets;

Yes.  Only one patch would be common to both host and guest which will
be sent as a separate patch.
I 'll rebase first patchset to -next and second patchset to kvm tree as
needed.

2. There are at least two versions of patch 15; I think the "PATCH
    RESEND RFC" is the right one.

True.

3. Patch 18 is controversial but there are performance numbers; these
    should be integrated in the patch description.

Current plan is to drop for patch 18 for now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux