On 08/05/2013 04:07 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > If we let L1 use EPT, we should probably also support the INVEPT instruction. > > In our current nested EPT implementation, when L1 changes its EPT table > for L2 (i.e., EPT12), L0 modifies the shadow EPT table (EPT02), and in > the course of this modification already calls INVEPT. But if last level > of shadow page is unsync not all L1's changes to EPT12 are intercepted, > which means roots need to be synced when L1 calls INVEPT. Global INVEPT > should not be different since roots are synced by kvm_mmu_load() each > time EPTP02 changes. Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
