Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: properly handle kvm emulation of hyperv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 24/07/2013 23:37, H. Peter Anvin ha scritto:
> What I'm suggesting is exactly that except that the native hypervisor is later in CPUID space.

Me too actually.

I was just suggesting an implementation of the idea (that takes into
account hypervisors detected by other means than CPUID).

Paolo

> KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> As Paolo suggested if there were some priority encoded, the guest could make an
>> informed decision. If the guest under question can run on both hypervisors A and B,
>> we would rather the guest discover hypervisor A when running on A and
>> hypervisor B when running on B. The priority encoding could be as simple as
>> surfacing the native hypervisor signature earlier in the CPUID space.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux