Re: [RFC PATCH] uio: uio_pci_generic: Add support for MSI interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 09:35:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:34:12PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:25:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:20:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:00:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > > Enable support for MSI interrupts if the device supports it.
> > > > > > > Since MSI interrupts are edge triggered, it is no longer necessary to
> > > > > > > disable interrupts in the kernel and re-enable them from user-space.
> > > > > > > Instead, clearing the interrupt condition in the user space application
> > > > > > > automatically re-enables the interrupt.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > An open question is if we can just do this unconditionally
> > > > > > > or if there should be some flag to enable it. A module parameter, maybe ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > NACK
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > UIO is for devices that don't do memory writes.
> > > > > > Anything that can do writes must be protected by an IOMMU
> > > > > > and/or have a secure kernel driver, not a UIO stub.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > MSI is done by memory writes so if userspace
> > > > > > controls the device it can trick it to write
> > > > > > anywhere in memory.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Just out of curiosity: Since MSI support is mandatory for all PCIE devices,
> > > > > isn't that possible anyway, even if MSI is not enabled by the kernel ?
> > > > > All one would need to do is to enable MSI from user space; after all,
> > > > > the chip configuration space is writable.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Guenter
> > > > 
> > > > If a device has capability to do writes, sure. So don't do this then :)
> > > > 
> > > Not an option. I need to use MSI.
> > > 
> > > Not that it matters anymore - turns out it was better writing a specific driver
> > > for my devices anyway; I needed to be able to disable chip interrupts before
> > > unloading the driver. But why is it then a reason to NACK this patch ?
> > 
> > There seem to be two cases - either you can't access the device -
> > and the uio driver is not useful - or you can, and it's not safe.
> > In both cases the patch does not seem to bring about anything
> > except user confusion ...
> > 
> Sounds like claiming that supporting MSI would cause some kind of confusion.
> Not sure if I can follow that logic.
> 
> Actually, it simplifies the user space code a lot. Since MSI interrupts are edge
> triggered and queued, it is not necessary to disable the interrupts, and all
> user space has to do is to remove the interrupt reason. Works quite nicely for
> our devices.
> 
> As I said, I don't really care too much anymore if this patch is rejected, but
> the reasons for the rejection are kind of weak.
> 
> > > Besides, doesn't one have to be root anyway to perform such activities,
> > > which could then be more easily accomplished by writing into /dev/mem ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guenter
> > 
> > root might not be able to write into /dev/mem.
> > 
> I don't really want to try, but at least it is marked rw for root.
> 
> Guenter

Yes but mechanisms such as selinux can still block it.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux