Il 03/07/2013 10:24, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto: > Hi Gleb and Paolo, > When I write test cases for nested virt and found that reading/writing > IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL will be simply ignored or return 0 (in > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c) in VM. Checking this MSR will be done by some > hypervisors (e.g. NOVA) and may cause error then, so it is necessary > to behave right when read/write it in VM. > > Are there any difficulties to handle this MSR? I have two solutions. > The first one is return the value of physical CPU's and always return > true when write. This is simple but may behave as if it is a VM > because write to it after VMXON will not return GP exception. This > solution can solve most basic problems since this MSR is not commonly > used. Another solution is adding a field in VCPU to handle this MSR. > This is a complex but better method. > > I think I can complete this if needed. Would it be enough to return 5 (binary 101) on reads if nested VMX is enabled, and #GP on writes? Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
