Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Should we have any expectation that a module name and it's filename
> should be equivalent?
>
> I was writing an auto-complete script for modprobe so it wouldn't give
> me the option to double load a module (I'd have to manually type it in if
> I really wanted it).
>
> Trouble is some modules with names w/underscores ('_') change
> register their names with a 'dash'.
But modprobe kvm_intel already works. Just convert any - to _?
> Would it be too much trouble to ask that the same names be used in
> both places?
Well, you could get kernel developers to rename their files with
underscores. I've CC'd them.
We use _ because we turn the module names into identifiers; it's also
the most common choice, and having both is just confusing.
> I have about 30 modules loaded now and out of that list,
> 2 are name changes:
>
> acpi_cpufreq (filename acip-cpufreq.ko)
> kvm_intel (filename kvm-intel.ko)
>
> If I load a bunch more... I find more that change names.
>
> Could the naming in the modules that do this be made consistent?
>
> Not doing so makes automatically tying a mod-name to it's file
> tend toward being non-deterministic.
>
> Many modules use '-' or '_' without being confused.
> It would be helpful if the few confused modules could
> get their identity straight. Is there a problem with
> making these names consistent?
It shouldn't break anything to rename them, if there's consensus I'm
happy to create a patch.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
