On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 05:29:37PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 06/09/2013 04:45 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > +static int emulator_fix_hypercall(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = emul_to_vcpu(ctxt);
> > + return kvm_exec_with_stopped_vcpu(vcpu->kvm,
> > + emulator_fix_hypercall_cb, ctxt);
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > /*
> > * Check if userspace requested an interrupt window, and that the
> > * interrupt window is open.
> > @@ -5761,6 +5769,10 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > kvm_deliver_pmi(vcpu);
> > if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC, vcpu))
> > vcpu_scan_ioapic(vcpu);
> > + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STOP_VCPU, vcpu)){
> > + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
>
> We should execute a serializing instruction here?
>
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -222,6 +222,18 @@ void kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(struct kvm *kvm)
> > make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC);
> > }
> >
> > +int kvm_exec_with_stopped_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int (*cb)(void *), void *data)
> > +{
> > + int r;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > + make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_STOP_VCPU);
> > + r = cb(data);
>
> And here?
Since the serialisation instruction the SDM suggest to use is CPUID I
think the point here is to flush CPU pipeline. Since all vcpus are out
of a guest mode I think out of order execution of modified instruction
is no an issue here.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
