[PATCH] get 2% or more performance improved by reducing spin_lock race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



the wake_up_process func is included by spin_lock/unlock in vhost_work_queue,
 but it could be done outside the spin_lock. 
I have test it with kernel 3.0.27 and guest suse11-sp2 using iperf, the num as below.
                 orignal                   modified
thread_num  tp(Gbps)   vhost(%)  |  tp(Gbps)     vhost(%)
1           9.59         28.82   |      9.59        27.49
8            9.61        32.92   |      9.62        26.77
64            9.58        46.48  |     9.55        38.99
256            9.6        63.7   |      9.6         52.59

Signed-off-by: Chuanyu Qin <qinchuanyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 94dbd25..8bee109 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -146,9 +146,10 @@ static inline void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 	if (list_empty(&work->node)) {
 		list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
 		work->queue_seq++;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
 		wake_up_process(dev->worker);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
+	} else
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
 }
 
 void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll)
-- 
1.7.3.1.msysgit.0
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux