On 06/05/2013 02:10:07 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:39 AM
> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-
> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alexander Graf
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support
>
> On 06/03/2013 03:54:22 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> > Mihai Caraman (6):
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Fix AltiVec interrupt numbers and build
breakage
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Rename IRQPRIO names to accommodate ALTIVEC
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add AltiVec support
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add ONE_REG AltiVec support
> > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Enhance FPU laziness
> >
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 16 ++-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 189
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h | 4 +-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S | 8 +-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 10 +-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c | 8 +-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c | 10 ++-
> > 7 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines like
> "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make
Linus
> happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/242896/ for 3.10. Then for 3.11,
> revert it after applying this patchset.
>
Why not 1/6 plus e6500 removal?
1/6 is not a bugfix.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
