Il 04/06/2013 17:43, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: > Hi Paolo, > > I don't think this is an issue. Gleb and Marcelo for example pulled > RMK's stable tree for my KVM/ARM updates for the 3.10 merge window and > that wasn't an issue. If Linus pulls the kvm/next tree first the > diffstat should be similar and everything clean enough, no? > > Catalin has previously expressed his wish to upstream the kvm/arm64 > patches directly through him given the churn in a completely new > architecture and he wants to make sure that everything looks right. > > It's a pretty clean implementation with quite few dependencies and > merging as a working series should be a priority instead of the > Kconfig hack, imho. Ok, let's see what Gleb says. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
