Re: [PATCH RFC V9 1/19] x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but jeremy@xxxxxxxx is my canonical email address.  The Citrix address
is dead and bounces, so is useless for anything.  Probably best to
change it.


Agreed.
I would change to goop address in the next posting.
I had the same doubt for Vatsa's email also. Even I am not sure about
the practice here. So had kept as is.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux