Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] add support for Hyper-V invariant TSC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:44:14PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 14:33, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Peter Lieven" <pl@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <vrozenfe@xxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gleb@xxxxxxxxxx, pl@xxxxxxx
> >Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:18:55 PM
> >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] add support for Hyper-V invariant TSC
> >
> >On 22.05.2013 23:23, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:22:55AM -0400, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>To: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <vrozenfe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gleb@xxxxxxxxxx, pl@xxxxxxx
> >>>Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:50:46 AM
> >>>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] add support for Hyper-V invariant TSC
> >>>
> >>>On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:06:37PM +1000, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>>>The following patch allows to activate a partition reference
> >>>>time enlightenment that is based on the host platform's support
> >>>>for an Invariant Time Stamp Counter (iTSC).
> >>>>NOTE: This code will survive migration due to lack of VM stop/resume
> >>>>handlers, when offset, scale and sequence should be
> >>>>readjusted.
> >>>>
> >>>>---
> >>>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++++-
> >>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>>index 9645dab..b423fe4 100644
> >>>>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >>>>@@ -1838,7 +1838,6 @@ static int set_msr_hyperv_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
> >>>>   		u64 gfn;
> >>>>   		unsigned long addr;
> >>>>   		HV_REFERENCE_TSC_PAGE tsc_ref;
> >>>>-		tsc_ref.TscSequence = 0;
> >>>>   		if (!(data & HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ENABLE)) {
> >>>>   			kvm->arch.hv_tsc_page = data;
> >>>>   			break;
> >>>>@@ -1848,6 +1847,11 @@ static int set_msr_hyperv_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
> >>>>   				HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ADDRESS_SHIFT);
> >>>>   		if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> >>>>   			return 1;
> >>>>+		tsc_ref.TscSequence =
> >>>>+				boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) ? 1 : 0;
> >>>
> >>>1) You want NONSTOP_TSC (see 40fb1715 commit) which matches INVARIANT TSC.
> >>>[VR]
> >>>Thank you for reviewing. Will fix it.
> >>>2) TscSequence should increase?
> >>>"This field serves as a sequence number that is incremented whenever..."
> >>>[VR]
> >>>Yes, on every VM resume, including migration. After migration we also need
> >>>to recalculate scale and adjust offset.
> >>>3) 0xFFFFFFFF is the value for invalid source of reference time?
> >>>[VR] Yes, on boot-up. In this case guest will go with PMTimer (not sure about HPET
> >>>but I can check). But if we set sequence to 0xFFFFFFFF after migration - it's probably will not work.
> >>
> >>"Reference TSC during Save and Restore and Migration
> >>
> >>To address migration scenarios to physical platforms that do not support
> >>iTSC, the TscSequence field is used. In the event that a guest partition
> >>is  migrated from an iTSC capable host to a non-iTSC capable host, the
> >>hypervisor sets TscSequence to the special value of 0xFFFFFFFF, which
> >>directs the guest operating system to fall back to a different clock
> >>source (for example, the virtual PM timer)."
> >>
> >>Why it would not/does not work after migration?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >what exactly do we heed the reference TSC for? the reference counter alone works great and it seems
> >that there is a lot of trouble and crash possibilities involved with the referece tsc.
> >
> >[VR]
> >Because it is incredibly light and fast.
> >The simple test which calls QueryPerformanceCounter in a
> >loop 10 millions times gives we the following results:
> >PMTimer     32269 ms
> >HPET        38466 ms
> >Ref Count   6499 ms
> >iTSC        1169 ms
> 
> is the ref_count with local_irq_disable or preempt_disable?
> 
irq disabling cannot account for such big difference.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux