Right now the wake_up_process func is included in spin_lock/unlock, but it could be done outside the spin_lock. I have test it with kernel 3.0.27 and guest suse11-sp2, it provide 2%-3% net performance improved. Signed-off-by: Chuanyu Qin <qinchuanyu@xxxxxxxxxx> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c 2013-05-20 10:36:30.000000000 +0800 +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c 2013-05-20 10:36:54.000000000 +0800 @@ -144,9 +144,10 @@ if (list_empty(&work->node)) { list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list); work->queue_seq++; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags); wake_up_process(dev->worker); - } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags); + } else + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags); } void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html