Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Hyper-H reference counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:14 +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 13.05.2013 13:45, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > Signed-off: Peter Lieven <pl@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The following patch allows to activate Hyper-V
> > reference time counter
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |  2 ++
> >   arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h |  3 +++
> >   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                 | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 3741c65..f0fee35 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -575,6 +575,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> >   	/* fields used by HYPER-V emulation */
> >   	u64 hv_guest_os_id;
> >   	u64 hv_hypercall;
> > +	u64 hv_ref_count;
> > +	u64 hv_tsc_page;
> >
> >   	#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_AUDIT
> >   	int audit_point;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h
> > index b80420b..9711819 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h
> > @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@
> >   /* MSR used to read the per-partition time reference counter */
> >   #define HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT		0x40000020
> >
> > +/* A partition's reference time stamp counter (TSC) page */
> > +#define HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC		0x40000021
> > +
> >   /* Define the virtual APIC registers */
> >   #define HV_X64_MSR_EOI				0x40000070
> >   #define HV_X64_MSR_ICR				0x40000071
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 094b5d9..1a4036d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rdpmc);
> >   static u32 msrs_to_save[] = {
> >   	MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK,
> >   	MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK_NEW,
> > -	HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL,
> > +	HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL,HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT,
> >   	HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE, MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME,
> >   	MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN,
> >   	MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
> > @@ -1764,6 +1764,8 @@ static bool kvm_hv_msr_partition_wide(u32 msr)
> >   	switch (msr) {
> >   	case HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID:
> >   	case HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL:
> > +	case HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC:
> > +	case HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT:
> >   		r = true;
> >   		break;
> >   	}
> > @@ -1803,6 +1805,21 @@ static int set_msr_hyperv_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
> >   		if (__copy_to_user((void __user *)addr, instructions, 4))
> >   			return 1;
> >   		kvm->arch.hv_hypercall = data;
> > +		kvm->arch.hv_ref_count = get_kernel_ns();
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	case HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC: {
> > +		u64 gfn;
> > +		unsigned long addr;
> > +		u32 tsc_ref;
> > +		gfn = data >> HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_PAGE_ADDRESS_SHIFT;
> > +		addr = gfn_to_hva(kvm, gfn);
> > +		if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> > +			return 1;
> > +		tsc_ref = 0;
> > +		if(__copy_to_user((void __user *)addr, &tsc_ref, sizeof(tsc_ref)))
> > +			return 1;
> > +		kvm->arch.hv_tsc_page = data;
> >   		break;
> >   	}
> >   	default:
> > @@ -2229,6 +2246,12 @@ static int get_msr_hyperv_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
> >   	case HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL:
> >   		data = kvm->arch.hv_hypercall;
> >   		break;
> > +	case HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT:
> > +		data = div_u64(get_kernel_ns() - kvm->arch.hv_ref_count,100);
> > +		break;
> 
> 
> in an earlier version of this patch I have the following:
> 
> +       case HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT: {
> +               u64 now_ns;
> +               local_irq_disable();
> +               now_ns = get_kernel_ns();
> +               data = div_u64(now_ns + kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset - kvm->arch.hv_ref_count,100);
> +               local_irq_enable();
> +               break;
> +       }
> 
> I do not know if this is right, but I can report that this one is working without any flaws
> since approx. 1.5 years.

Hi Peter,
I created this patch based on the original code posted  
in thread http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=133278705514826
But please feel free to send your version, if you see any problem 
in the current code.
Best regards,
Vadim.


> Peter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux