On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:24:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:16:09PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:11:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:05:12PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:59:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:54:16PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > > > > > In commit a0f155e96 'KVM: Initialize irqfd from kvm_init()', when
> > > > > > kvm_init() is called the second time (e.g kvm-amd.ko and kvm-intel.ko),
> > > > > > kvm_arch_init() will fail with -EEXIST,
> > > > >
> > > > > Wow. Is this intentional?
> > > >
> > > > I think it is. You can not be amd and intel at the same time ;-)
> > > >
> > > > kvm_arch_init
> > > >
> > > > if (kvm_x86_ops) {
> > > > printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: already loaded the other module\n");
> > > > r = -EEXIST;
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > Interesting. So we check it with
> > > if (kvm_x86_ops)
> > > and later we do
> > > kvm_x86_ops = ops;
> > >
> > >
> > > This looks racy - or is something serializing
> > > module loading?
> > >
> > I think module loading is serialized.
> >
>
> Hmm then I don't understand ... both kvm-intel
> and kvm-amd *can't* be loaded at the same time:
> module loading fails for one of them.
>
Why would it fail?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
