On 04/25/2013 05:09 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: tiejun.chen [mailto:tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8 v3] KVM: PPC: e500: Add e6500 core to Kconfig
description
On 04/11/2013 06:03 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
Add e6500 core to Kconfig description.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3:
- No change
arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig
index 63c67ec..4489520 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -136,15 +136,15 @@ config KVM_E500V2
If unsure, say N.
config KVM_E500MC
- bool "KVM support for PowerPC E500MC/E5500 processors"
+ bool "KVM support for PowerPC E500MC/E5500/E6500 processors"
depends on PPC_E500MC
select KVM
select KVM_MMIO
select KVM_BOOKE_HV
select MMU_NOTIFIER
---help---
- Support running unmodified E500MC/E5500 (32-bit) guest kernels in
I ever tried p5040ds but failed with 64-bit, but looks are you saying
this patch
set can make e5500/e6500 work well with 64-bit? If so, will we need to
upgrade
qemu or something else like dtb?
KVM should work on p5040ds with and without this patchset. The latest
qemu requires this patch: "powerpc: Add paravirt idle loop for 64-bit Book-E",
you will not pass guest udev without it.
Which should qemu tree be used here?
My tree is cloned from:
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/agraf.git ppc-next
But I can't find this commit.
Tiejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
