On 04/23/2013 02:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 16:49 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Given the fairly high cost of rescheduling a VCPU (which is likely
to include an IPI), versus the short hold time of most spinlocks,
I have the strong suspicion that your approach would win.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/2/101
If you schedule too often your SPIN_THRESHOLD is far too low.
Anyway.. performance can't be that bad, otherwise Jeremey would have
spend as much time on it as he did.
When I experimented last time ideal SPIN_THRESHOLD for PLE machine,
was around 4k, 8k. Jeremy's experiment was on a non-PLE machine AFAIK,
which complemented PLE feature in a nice way with 2k threshold.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
