On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:53:27PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:32:30PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:09:53AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:05:53AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > > > > index 88ebb79..8f05528 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> > > > > @@ -111,6 +111,24 @@ static bool tcm_vhost_check_feature(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int feature)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static bool tcm_vhost_check_endpoint(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + bool ret = false;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * We can handle the vq only after the endpoint is setup by calling the
> > > > > + * VHOST_SCSI_SET_ENDPOINT ioctl.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * TODO: Check that we are running from vhost_worker which acts
> > > > > + * as read-side critical section for vhost kind of RCU.
> > > > > + * See the comments in struct vhost_virtqueue in drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1))
> > > > > + ret = true;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > You can't use RCU in this way. You need to actually
> > > > derefence. Instead, just move this within vq mutex
> > > > and do rcu_dereference_protected. document that this function
> > > > requires vq mutex.
> > >
> > > Any difference with:
> > >
> > > vs_tpg = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
> >
> > Yes, it's not the same. rcu_dereference_protected says
> > "this is generally RCU but here I use it under lock".
> > rcu_dereference_check can only be used if you
> > really dereference later, and you don't.
>
> So you want the helper to be this?
>
> static bool tcm_vhost_check_endpoint()
> {
> struct tcm_vhost_tpg **vs_tpg;
>
> vs_tpg = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
> if (vs_tpg)
> return true;
> else
> return false
> }
>
> And what difference code the compiler will generate with this:
>
> static bool tcm_vhost_check_endpoint()
> {
>
> if (rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1))
> return true
> else
> return false
> }
>
No, what I want is that private data is
either dereferenced (not tested against NULL)
or used under vq mutex.
In this case the second option is the easiest
and the cleanest. So move it under mutex
and then test it safely without rcu.
> >
> > > if (vs_tpg)
> > > return ture
> > > else
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > Note, tcm_vhost_check_endpoint() is called in multiple places. Having a
> > > helper is more convenient.
> >
> > I'm fine with the helper, but fix the implementation
> > and fix all callers to have vq mutex when calling.
>
> All the caller are in the vhost thread. Why need vq mutex to be taken?
vhost thread is an implementation detail, people are experimenting with
various threading strategies. In particular, code must
keep working when we move it to use a workqueue.
> > > > > static int tcm_vhost_check_true(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg)
> > > > > {
> > > > > return 1;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.8.1.4
> > >
> > > --
> > > Asias
>
> --
> Asias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
