Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] tcm_vhost: Wait for pending requests in vhost_scsi_flush()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:16:51PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> This patch makes vhost_scsi_flush() wait for all the pending requests
> issued before the flush operation to be finished.
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Use kref and completion
> - Fail req if vs->vs_inflight is NULL
> - Rename tcm_vhost_alloc_inflight to tcm_vhost_set_inflight
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Introduce vhost_scsi_inflight
> - Drop array to track flush
> - Use RCU to protect vs_inflight explicitly
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebase
> - Drop 'tcm_vhost: Wait for pending requests in
>   vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint()' in this series, we already did that in
>   'tcm_vhost: Use vq->private_data to indicate if the endpoint is setup'
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Increase/Decrease inflight requests in
>   vhost_scsi_{allocate,free}_cmd and tcm_vhost_{allocate,free}_evt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@xxxxxxxxxx>

OK looks good, except error handling needs to be fixed.

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h |   5 +++
>  2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> index 4ae6725..ef40a8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ enum {
>  #define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ	128
>  #define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_EVENT	128
>  
> +struct vhost_scsi_inflight {
> +	struct completion comp; /* Wait for the flush operation to finish */
> +	struct kref kref; /* Refcount for the inflight reqs */
> +};
> +
>  struct vhost_scsi {
>  	/* Protected by vhost_scsi->dev.mutex */
>  	struct tcm_vhost_tpg **vs_tpg;
> @@ -91,6 +96,8 @@ struct vhost_scsi {
>  	struct mutex vs_events_lock; /* protect vs_events_dropped,events_nr */
>  	bool vs_events_dropped; /* any missed events */
>  	int vs_events_nr; /* num of pending events */
> +
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight __rcu *vs_inflight; /* track inflight reqs */
>  };
>  
>  /* Local pointer to allocated TCM configfs fabric module */
> @@ -108,6 +115,51 @@ static int iov_num_pages(struct iovec *iov)
>  	       ((unsigned long)iov->iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  }
>  
> +static int tcm_vhost_set_inflight(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	inflight = kzalloc(sizeof(*inflight), GFP_KERNEL);

kzalloc is not needed, you initialize all fields.

> +	if (inflight) {
> +		kref_init(&inflight->kref);
> +		init_completion(&inflight->comp);
> +		ret = 0;
> +	}
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(vs->vs_inflight, inflight);

So if allocation fails, we stop tracking inflights?
This looks strange, and could break guests. Why not the usual
	if (!inflight)
		return -ENOMEM;

> +	synchronize_rcu();

open call is different:
	- sync is not needed
	- should use RCU_INIT_POINTER and not rcu_assign_pointer

So please move these out and make this function return the struct:
	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight
	tcm_vhost_alloc_inflight(void)


> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vhost_scsi_inflight *
> +tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(struct vhost_scsi *vs)

And then inc will not need to return inflight pointer,
which is really unusual.

> +{
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	inflight = rcu_dereference(vs->vs_inflight);
> +	if (inflight)
> +		kref_get(&inflight->kref);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return inflight;
> +}
> +
> +void tcm_vhost_done_inflight(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
> +
> +	inflight = container_of(kref, struct vhost_scsi_inflight, kref);
> +	complete(&inflight->comp);
> +}
> +
> +static void tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight)
> +{
> +	if (inflight)

Here as in other places, inflight must never be NULL.
Pls fix code so that invariant holds.

> +		kref_put(&inflight->kref, tcm_vhost_done_inflight);
> +}
> +
>  static bool tcm_vhost_check_feature(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int feature)
>  {
>  	bool ret = false;
> @@ -402,6 +454,7 @@ static int tcm_vhost_queue_tm_rsp(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
>  static void tcm_vhost_free_evt(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct tcm_vhost_evt *evt)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
> +	tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(evt->inflight);
>  	vs->vs_events_nr--;
>  	kfree(evt);
>  	mutex_unlock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
> @@ -413,21 +466,27 @@ static struct tcm_vhost_evt *tcm_vhost_allocate_evt(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
>  	struct tcm_vhost_evt *evt;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
> -	if (vs->vs_events_nr > VHOST_SCSI_MAX_EVENT) {
> -		vs->vs_events_dropped = true;
> -		mutex_unlock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (vs->vs_events_nr > VHOST_SCSI_MAX_EVENT)
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	evt = kzalloc(sizeof(*evt), GFP_KERNEL);

BTW it looks like we should replace this kzalloc with kmalloc.
Should be a separate patch ...

>  	if (evt) {
>  		evt->event.event = event;
>  		evt->event.reason = reason;
> +		evt->inflight = tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(vs);
> +		if (!evt->inflight) {

We drop an event because earlier
we run out of memory for allocating the inflight counter.
Does not make sense to me.

> +			kfree(evt);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>  		vs->vs_events_nr++;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
>  
>  	return evt;
> +out:
> +	vs->vs_events_dropped = true;
> +	mutex_unlock(&vs->vs_events_lock);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void vhost_scsi_free_cmd(struct tcm_vhost_cmd *tv_cmd)
> @@ -445,6 +504,8 @@ static void vhost_scsi_free_cmd(struct tcm_vhost_cmd *tv_cmd)
>  		kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_sgl);
>  	}
>  
> +	tcm_vhost_dec_inflight(tv_cmd->inflight);
> +
>  	kfree(tv_cmd);
>  }
>  
> @@ -595,6 +656,9 @@ static struct tcm_vhost_cmd *vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd(
>  	tv_cmd->tvc_data_direction = data_direction;
>  	tv_cmd->tvc_nexus = tv_nexus;
>  	tv_cmd->tvc_vhost = vs;
> +	tv_cmd->inflight = tcm_vhost_inc_inflight(vs);
> +	if (!tv_cmd->inflight)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	return tv_cmd;
>  }
> @@ -982,12 +1046,35 @@ static void vhost_scsi_flush_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, int index)
>  
>  static void vhost_scsi_flush(struct vhost_scsi *vs)
>  {
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	/* inflight points to the old inflight */
> +	inflight = rcu_dereference_protected(vs->vs_inflight,
> +					     lockdep_is_held(&vs->dev.mutex));
> +
> +	/* Allocate a new inflight and make vs->vs_inflight points to it */
> +	if (tcm_vhost_set_inflight(vs) < 0)
> +		pr_warn("vhost_scsi_flush failed to allocate inflight\n");

That's unlikely to reach the application. How about we stop here,
and propagate the error to ioctl caller?

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The inflight->kref was initialized to 1. We decrement it here to
> +	 * indicate the start of the flush operation so that it will reach 0
> +	 * when all the reqs are finished.
> +	 */
> +	kref_put(&inflight->kref, tcm_vhost_done_inflight);
> +
> +	/* Flush both the vhost poll and vhost work */
>  	for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++)
>  		vhost_scsi_flush_vq(vs, i);
>  	vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_completion_work);
>  	vhost_work_flush(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_event_work);
> +
> +	/* Wait for all reqs issued before the flush to be finished */
> +	if (inflight) {

inflight should never be NULL, otherwise inflight
tracjing is not effective. Please fix error handling so we
never reach here with inflight == NULL.

> +		wait_for_completion(&inflight->comp);
> +		kfree(inflight);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1196,6 +1283,9 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>  	s->vs_events_dropped = false;
>  	mutex_init(&s->vs_events_lock);
>  
> +	if (tcm_vhost_set_inflight(s) < 0)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +

Better propagate the return code to user.

>  	s->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_CTL].handle_kick = vhost_scsi_ctl_handle_kick;
>  	s->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_EVT].handle_kick = vhost_scsi_evt_handle_kick;
>  	for (i = VHOST_SCSI_VQ_IO; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++)
> @@ -1221,6 +1311,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>  	vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint(s, &t);
>  	vhost_dev_stop(&s->dev);
>  	vhost_dev_cleanup(&s->dev, false);
> +	kfree(s->vs_inflight);
>  	kfree(s);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> index 94e9ee53..7567767 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  #define TCM_VHOST_NAMELEN 256
>  #define TCM_VHOST_MAX_CDB_SIZE 32
>  
> +struct vhost_scsi_inflight;
>  struct tcm_vhost_cmd {
>  	/* Descriptor from vhost_get_vq_desc() for virt_queue segment */
>  	int tvc_vq_desc;
> @@ -37,6 +38,8 @@ struct tcm_vhost_cmd {
>  	unsigned char tvc_sense_buf[TRANSPORT_SENSE_BUFFER];
>  	/* Completed commands list, serviced from vhost worker thread */
>  	struct llist_node tvc_completion_list;
> +	/* Used to track inflight req */
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
>  };
>  
>  struct tcm_vhost_nexus {
> @@ -91,6 +94,8 @@ struct tcm_vhost_evt {
>  	struct virtio_scsi_event event;
>  	/* virtio_scsi event list, serviced from vhost worker thread */
>  	struct llist_node list;
> +	/* Used to track inflight req */
> +	struct vhost_scsi_inflight *inflight;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux