Hi, Am 08.04.2013 18:05, schrieb Sriram Murthy: > The Virtualbox SVGA card was derived out of the KVM VGA card, so there are quite a few similarities (I am deliberately being vague here as I am still in the process of discovering the features of both these cards completely). Having said that, the APIs and the data structures themselves have been modified to add new features (like displaying a custom bmp as the VGA bootup logo) and it has a custom vga bios as well. > Also, it is better that it be its own separate device model, so that maintenance of the vbox code becomes easier later. Further, I am thinking on the lines of retaining the VIrtualbox SVGA card code as is, and write a small KVM abstraction layer, so that it will be easy to port the bug fixes into the vbox SVGA card later on. > Any comments/suggestions welcome here. Personally, I think that the connection between VirtualBox and QEMU is very unidirectional if there is any... So code-wise our focus should rather be to avoid code copies/divergence within our tree and to share code with existing in-tree devices, especially if you are not paid to continuously take care of this device once accepted into QEMU - that's how I interpret PMM's question below. There is nothing generally wrong with using KVM for guest driver development or to make existing stripped-down guest images work at all by adding such a special device. However, proposing to adopt a random vendor's paravirtual graphics card just because it has a few more resolutions and drivers on a particular platform does not strike me as a big advantage over SPICE, VMware VGA or past virtio-vga/-fb standardization attempts. Regards, Andreas > > -Sriram > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: Sriram Murthy <sriramsm@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx>; qemu list <qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>; "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 8:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Virtualbox svga card in KVM > > On 6 April 2013 00:52, Sriram Murthy <sriramsm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> (actually, the virtualbox SVGA card is based off of the KVM VGA card) > > Is it possible to implement it as an extension to the VGA > card device, or has it diverged incompatibly such that it > has to be its own separate device model? > > thanks > -- PMM -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
