On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:13AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > > On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote: > > > On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote: > > >> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives > > >> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and > > >> tcm_vhost backends). > > >> > > >> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which > > >> has already gone into virtio-next today. > > >> We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring > > >> rework pathes. > > >> > > >> V7: respin to fix the patch apply error > > >> > > >> V6: rework "redo allocation of target data" (James) > > >> fix comments (Venkatesh) > > >> rebase to virtio-next > > >> > > >> V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo) > > >> move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_add_sgs for command buffers'. (Asias) > > >> > > >> V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch) > > >> > > >> V3 and be found http://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=136067440717154&w=2 > > >> > > >> > > >> It would probably be easier to get it in via Rusty's tree > > >> because of the prerequisites. James, can we get your Acked-by? > > > > > > James, any thoughts for this version? > > > > Ping James.... > > Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I > commented on. I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to > that one. Since it's going through the virtio tree, don't wait for me, > put it in and I'll make you fix up anything I find later that I'm > unhappy with. So, Rusty, could you pick this up in your virtio-next tree? > James > > -- Asias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
